Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:16

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are some ways to help bring out natural curly/wavy hair?
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is your review of House of the Dragon, season 2, episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Scientists Crack 30-Year Mystery Behind “Holy Grail” Cancer Drug - SciTechDaily
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why prices from these cities in Utah and Nebraska won't be included in inflation data - NPR
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Top prospects for 2025 Draft arrive in Buffalo for Scouting Combine - NHL.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The No. 1 Breakfast to Boost Heart Health, According Cardiologist - TODAY.com